Indiana University Bloomington

Selected Publications

Scholars affiliated with the Center regularly publish in top law journals, as well as academic and popular press books. Many are also active bar members who file amicus briefs in high profile IP court cases. This page contains a sample of our members’ recent contributions.

Looking for our online journal, IP Theory? This student-edited publication can be reached by clicking here.

Arpan Banerjee

Copyright Piracy and the Indian Film Industry: A Realist Assessment (forthcoming, 2016).

Forum Shopping in IP Infringement Cases in India (forthcoming, 2016).

Internet Censorship in India, in DIGITAL DEMOCRACY IN A GLOBALISED WORLD (Corien Prins et al., eds., Edward Elgar 2015).

The Law and Politics of Pharmaceutical Patents in India, in PERSPECTIVES ON INNOVATION AND IPRS IN CHINA AND INDIA (Kung Chung Liu, Uday Racheria eds., Springer 2015).

Spillover Reputation in Passing Off Actions:  Indian and English Law Compared, Oxford U. Commonwealth L.J. (forthcoming 2014).

Non-origin Infringement: Has Trade Mark Law Gone Too Far?, 5 International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 555 (Max Planck Institute, Munich) (2012).

Comparative Advertising and the Tort of Generic Disparagement, 5 Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 791 (2010).

How Hollywood Can Sue Bollywood for Copyright Infringement and Save Indian Cinema, 32 European Intellectual Property Review 498 (Sweet & Maxwell, London) (2010).

Ashish Bharadwaj

Psychology of Innovation:  Innovating Human Psychology in TECHNOLOGICAL AND INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATIONS FOR MARGINALIZED SMALLHOLDERS (with Kumar) (F. Gatzweiler and J. von Braun, eds., Springer, 2015).

IP and International Competitiveness and Trade, Processes and Contributions of IP Systems to Innovation, OECD Innovation Policy Platform (with Marta Diaz Pozo).

Combined Uses of Intellectual Property, Processes and Contributions of IP Systems to Innovation, OECD

Greg Castanias

Federal Appellate Practice and Procedure (with Klonoff) (2nd ed. 2015).

Inside the Minds:  The Impact of Recent Patent Law Cases and Developments (Aspatore Books, a Thomson Reuters business, December 2014).

2010 Patent Law Decisions of the Federal Circuit: The Advent of the Rader Court, 60 Am. U. L. Rev. 845 (2011).

Survey of the Federal Circuit’s Patent Law Decisions in 2006: A New Chapter in the Ongoing Dialogue with the Supreme Court, 56 Am. U. L. Rev. 793 (2007).

Jason J. Du Mont

AMERICAN DESIGN PATENT PROTECTION: A COMPARATIVE LEGAL HISTORY (with Janis) (Cambridge University Press, forthcoming 2016).

Disclosing Designs, – VAND. L. REV. – (with Janis) (forthcoming 2016).

Brief for Amicus Curiae Indiana University Maurer School of Law Center for Intellectual Property Research, Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. (Fed. Cir. 2014) (with Janis).

American Design Patent Law: A Comparative Legal History (with Mark Janis) (Cambridge University Press, forthcoming 2015).

Creativity in Design (dissertation) (forthcoming 2014).

The Origins of American Design Protection, 88 Ind. L.J. 3 (2013) (with Mark Janis).

Virtual Designs, Stanford Technology Law Review (forthcoming 2013) (with Mark Janis).

Creativity in Design (dissertation) (forthcoming 2013).

Functionality in Design Protection Systems, 19 J. Intell. Prop. L. 261 (2012) (with Mark Janis).

A Non-Obvious Design: Reexamining the Design Patent Standard, 45 Gonz. L. Rev. 531 (2009/10), reprinted in Patent Law Review (Thomson West 2011 ed.)

Laura Foster

The Making and Unmaking of Patent Ownership: Technicalities, Materialities, and Subjectivities, PoLAR (forthcoming 2016).

Decolonizing Patent Law:  Postcolonial Technoscience and Indigenous Knowledge in South Africa, Feminist Formations (forthcoming 2016).

Critical Cultural Translation:  A Socio-Legal Framework for Regulatory Orders, Special Invited Issue on Regulatory Translations, 21 Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 79-105 (2014).

Patents, Biopolitics, and Feminisms: Locating Patent Law Struggles Over Breast Cancer Genes and the Hoodia Plant, 19 International Journal of Cultural Property 371 (2012).

Situating Feminisms, Patent Law, and the Public Domain, 20 Colum. J. of Gender & L. 261 (2011).

Mark D. Janis

AMERICAN DESIGN PATENT PROTECTION: A COMPARATIVE LEGAL HISTORY (with Du Mont) (Cambridge University Press, forthcoming 2016).

Disclosing Designs, – VAND. L. REV. – (with Du Mont) (forthcoming 2016).

Expressive Eligibility, – CAL. IRVINE L. REV. – (with Holbrook) (2016).

Brief of Amici Curiae Indiana University Maurer School of Law Center for Intellectual Property Research, Purdue Pharma L.P., The P.F. Laboratories, Inc., Purdue Pharmaceuticals L.P., and Rhodes Technologies v Epic Pharma, LLC (Fed. Cir. 2016) (with Knebel).

Alas, Alice: Patent-Eligible Processes from an Audience Perspective, 17 VAND. J. ENT. TECH. 349 (with Holbrook) (2015).

Brief of Amici Curiae Indiana University Maurer School of Law Center for Intellectual Property Research, Stephen Kimble v. Marvel Enterprises (U.S. Sup. Ct. 2015).

Brief of Amici Curiae Indiana University Maurer School of Law Center for Intellectual Property Research, Purdue Pharma L.P., The P.F. Laboratories, Inc., Purdue Pharmaceuticals L.P., and Rhodes Technologies v Epic Pharma, LLC (Fed. Cir. 2014) (with Knebel).

Patent-Eligible Processes:  An Audience Perspective, 17 Vand. J. Ent. & Tech. L. 349 (with Holbrook) (2015).

Intellectual Property Law of Plants (with Jervis and Peet) (Oxford, 2014).

Trademarks: Critical Concepts (with Dinwoodie) (edited collection; 2 vols.) (Edward Elgar, 2014).

Amicus Brief in Stephen Kimble, et al., v. Marvel Enterprises, Inc., (U.S. Supreme Court) (on behalf of the Center for Intellectual Property Research) (January 2014).

Patenting Plants: A Comparative Synthesis, in Okediji & Bagley (eds.), Global Perspectives on Patent Law (Oxford 2014).

Trademark & Unfair Competition Law in a Nutshell (West 2013).

The Origins of American Design Patent Protection, 88 Ind. L.J. 837 (with Du Mont) (2013).

Virtual Designs – Stanford Technology Law Review (with Du Mont) (2013).

Patent Law’s Audience 97 Minnesota Law Review 72 (with Timothy R. Holbrook) (2012).

Functionality in Design Protection Systems, 19 J. Intell. Prop. L. 261 (with Jason J. Du Mont) (2012).

Tuning the Obviousness Inquiry After KSR, 7 Wash. J. Law, Tech. & Arts 335 (2012).

IP AND ANTITRUST LAW: AN ANALYSIS OF ANTITRUST PRINCIPLES APPLIED TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW (2001) (with Hovenkamp, Lemley, and Leslie) (2 vols.) (with annual updates 2002-2009) (2d ed. 2010) (annual updates 2011-).

TRADEMARKS & UNFAIR COMPETITION: LAW & POLICY (1st ed. 2004) (with Dinwoodie) (1st ed. supplements 2005, 2006) (2d. ed. 2007) (2d ed. supplements 2008, 2009) (3d ed. 2010) (3d ed. supplement 2011, 2012) (4th ed. 2013) (4th ed. Updates Fall 2014, Spring 2015, Fall 2015) (5th ed. forthcoming 2016).

Don Knebel

Brief of Amici Curiae Indiana University Maurer School of Law Center for Intellectual Property Research, Purdue Pharma L.P., The P.F. Laboratories, Inc., Purdue Pharmaceuticals L.P., and Rhodes Technologies v Epic Pharma, LLC (Fed. Cir. 2016) (with Janis).

Brief of Amici Curiae Indiana University Maurer School of Law Center for Intellectual Property Research, Purdue Pharma L.P., The P.F. Laboratories, Inc., Purdue Pharmaceuticals L.P., and Rhodes Technologies v Epic Pharma, LLC (Fed. Cir. 2014) (with Janis).

Amicus Brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in Retractable Technologies, Inc., et al., v. Becton, Dickinson and Company (with Timothy R. Holbrook, Mark Janis and Todd G. Vare) (May 2012).

Marshall Leaffer

COPYRIGHT LAW, 10th ed. (with Craig Joyce, et al.). Newark: LexisNexis, 2016 (with cumulative supplement)

Vers un nouveau modèle économique d’édition aux États-Unis in LE DROIT D’AUTEUR ET LES MAISONS (Evard and Piotraut eds., l’Harmatan 2016).

Fair Use, Transformative Use and the First Amendment in INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND HUMAN RIGHTS, 3rd ed. (Torremans, ed., Kluwer 2015).

Trademarking Color in INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW AND POLICY (Hansen ed., Juris Publications 2015).

Understanding Copyright Law (Lexis/Nexis 6th ed. 2014).

Protection of Well-Known Marks:  A Transnational Perspective in Trademark Protection and Territoriality:  Challenges in a Global Economy (Carboli & Lee eds., Edward Elgar 2014).

Les œuvres orphelines ont droit à un domicile in Mélanges en l’honneur du professeur André Lucas (Collection Mélanges) (LexisNexis) (2014).

A Twenty-Year Retrospective on United States Trademark Law in Ten Cases, 23 Fordham Intell. Prop., Media & Ent. L.J. 655 (2013).

INTERNATIONAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, Aspen Publishing (Forthcoming, 2013).

GREY MARKETS AND STATUS GOODS, Juris Publications (Forthcoming, 2012).

The Lanham Act: A Twenty Year Perspective, 81 Fordham Law Review (Forthcoming, 2012).

The Time Has Arrived to Give Orphan Works a Home, 43 INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COMPETITION LAW 623 (2012).

Lettre d’Amérique, L’importance de la session 2010-2011 de la Cour suprême des Etats-Unis, 40 PROPRIETES INTELLECTUELLES 58 (2011).

Book Review. Walter, European Copyright Law: A Commentary, 58 JOURNAL OF THE COPYRIGHT SOCIETY OF THE U.S.A. 737 (2011).

Michael Mattioli

Measuring the Costs and Benefits of Patent Pools, (with Merges) (forthcoming, 2016).

Data Pools, (forthcoming, 2016).

Big Data, Bigger Dilemmas: A Critical Review, J. ASSOC. INF. SCI. TECHNOL. (with Ekbia, Sugimoto et al.) (2015).

Big Data is Not a Monolith (co-editor with Cassidy Sugimoto and Hamid Ekbia, MIT Press, forthcoming 2015).

Disclosing Big Data, 99 Minnesota Law Review 525 (2014).

Power and Governance in Patent Pools, 27 Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 421 (2014).

Quasi-Patents & Semi-Patents in Biobanking in Compariative Issues in the Governance of Research Biobanks (Springer) (2013) (with Gideon Parchomovsky).

Communities of Innovation, 106 Northwestern University Law Review 103 (2012).

Why Do Patent Holders Cooperate? The Legal Workshop, July 1, 2012.

Partial Patents, 111 Columbia Law Review 207 (2011) (with Gideon Parchomovsky).

Producers Should Trump Aggregators (op-ed letter) Wall Street Journal, July 6, 2011.

Cooling-Off & Secondary Markets, 15 Virginia Journal of Law & Technology 227 (2010).

Chung-Lun Shen

Patent Infringement and Reasonable Allowance of New Technologies in Claim Construction, DEPAUL J. ART, TECH. & INTELL. PROP. L. (forthcoming 2015).

The Secondary Liability of Internet Service Provider under Trademark Law in terms of Comparative Perspectives, The 2015 Asia-Pacific Intellectual Property Forum, College of Law, National Taiwan University, (2015).

The Practical Model for Calculation of the FRAND Licensing Royalties in terms of Resolution of Hold-up and Royalty-Stacking Disputes, The 12th Asian Law Institute Conference, College of Law, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 2015).

Reflections on the Justified Limitation of Patent Enforcement in the Industry of Telecommunication in Terms of Standard Essential Patents and FRAND Licensing (forthcoming 2014)

Remedies of Standard Essential Patent Abuses in Terms of FRAND Licensing (forthcoming 2014)

Elegy of Software Innovation in the Era of Electronic Commerce – Patent Eligibility of Business Methods in Terms of Comparative Perspectives (forthcoming 2014)

Reasonable Royalties and the Calculation of Patent Damages: Some Reflections and Recommendations for a Fair and Adequate Calculating Basis of Reasonable Royalties in Terms of Harmonization of China-Taiwan Regional Patent Laws, 12 CHI.-KENT J. INTELL. PROP. 156 (2013)

Intellectual Property Rights and International Free Trade —New Jurisprudence of International Exhaustion Doctrine under Traditional Legal System, 7 Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology, 176 (2012) (Denmark)

Lynn Tyler

Akamai and McKesson: A Better Route to a Better Result?, September 21, 2012 edition of Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal

Tightening FDA Nanotech Regs on Food, Cosmetics, May 25, 2012 edition of Law360′s Expert Analysis section

Co-Author of Barnes and Thornburg LLP’s Food, Drug & Device e-publication – Spring 2012, Winter 2012, Fall 2011

Section III of Mayo v. Prometheus: Better Left Unwritten?, for the April 6, 2012 edition of BNA’s Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal

Richard Li-dar Wang

Mental Element of Patent Infringement Compensation in Taiwan: Comparative Implications from Empirical Study of Judicial Decisions, (with Hong), The 4th Annual Conference of the Younger Comparativists Committee of the American Society of Comparative Law, Tallahassee, FL, U.S.A. (2015).

Ancillary Orders of Compulsory Licensing and Their Compatibility with the TRIPS Agreement, 18 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 86 (2014)

Patent Protection of Pharmacologically Active Metabolites: Theoretical and Technological Analysis on the Jurisprudence of Four Regions, 29 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L.J. 489 (2013) (with Pei-Chen Huang)

Deviated, Unsound, and Self-Retreating: A Critical Assessment of Princo v. ITC en banc Decision, 16 Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review 51 (2012)

Biomedical Upstream Patenting and Scientific Research: A Case for Compulsory Licensing Bearing Reach-Through Royalties, 10 Yale Journal of Law and Technology 251 (2008)